FLAGSHIP CAPABILITY · WATER QUALITY + GIS

From source records
to quality decisions.

Bring drinking-water source records, laboratory results, GIS analysis, institutional monitoring and sanitary risk into one management view.

Source identity

Test result

Spatial evidence

Decision

Explore the GIS view

ILLUSTRATIVE WATER-QUALITY VIEW

ACTIVE PARAMETER

ArsenicGEO-LINKED

VERIFIED SOURCE LOCATION

PARAMETER-LEVEL RESULT

GIS-BASED DECISION SUPPORT

FROM WATER TESTING TO WATER QUALITY INTELLIGENCE

One connected view of sources, testing and risk.

Horizen connects source inventories and water-quality records with geographic filters, testing summaries, sanitary survey findings and reporting. Teams can review where testing has taken place, what the results show and which areas need further attention.

THE VERIFIED EVIDENCE CHAIN

From source records to water-quality decisions.

Each stage carries the source identity and its evidence forward.

Source

Organise source identity, category and location in a searchable register.

Testing

Connect laboratory results, testing coverage and repeat tests to the source.

GIS analysis

Review parameter results across district, block, GP and village geography.

Risk

Read quality results alongside sanitary risk and institutional coverage.

Reports

Bring filtered evidence into monthly reports and management review.

INTERACTIVE THEMATIC VIEW

Change the parameter. Keep the source identity.

Select a chemical or bacteriological parameter to explore an illustrative result layer. FRC means free residual chlorine. The points and classifications below are demonstration data, not live measurements or a water-safety assessment.

SELECTED LAYER

Arsenic

Source-level safe and unsafe spatial review

Safe result

Unsafe result

Demonstration data · No real source identities shown

THE MANAGEMENT VIEW

Six perspectives. A connected evidence base.

Source inventory

PWSS, pump houses, standposts, handpump tubewells and other drinking-water sources. Search by source category, habitation and platform status.

Which sources are recorded and tested?

Testing & statistics

Free residual chlorine (FRC), arsenic, iron, Total Coliform and E. coli. Review sample counts, safe/unsafe results and maximum, minimum, mean and median values.

What do the test results show?

Geographic analysis

District, laboratory, block, Gram Panchayat, village and date filters connect the reporting view to a selected area. Parameter-based maps support spatial review.

Where does attention need to be focused?

Institutional monitoring

Separate views for schools, Anganwadi centres and health centres bring together drinking-water sources, testing coverage and safety status.

How are institutional sources being monitored?

Sanitary risk

Low, intermediate, high and very high sanitary risk categories support comparisons across community and institutional sources alongside testing results.

Which sources need closer review?

Queries & reporting

Predefined and dynamic query entry points cover availability, functionality, testing, repeat testing, safety and sanitary surveys, with monthly and comprehensive reports.

What evidence supports the next decision?

VERIFIABLE SOURCE IDENTITY

Coordinates connect the field source to its test history.

The public visual is illustrative and contains no real source names, IDs, coordinates or infrastructure details.

WHY GEO-TAGGING MATTERS

Know which source failed. Know where it is. Know what needs attention.

Contaminants such as arsenic cannot be identified by sight or taste. Reliable decisions therefore depend on a testing record that can be traced back to the correct physical source.

DECISION-READY OUTPUTS

Evidence that remains useful after the test.

Source inventories with geographic and category filters

Testing coverage, safe/unsafe summaries and result statistics

Institutional monitoring, sanitary risk and repeat-testing views

Predefined queries, dynamic queries and monthly reports

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Only confirmed capabilities are presented as delivered work.

Programme-specific extensions and unverified metrics are excluded from this public page until they are reviewed and approved.

FROM TEST RESULT TO MANAGEMENT ACTION

Make water-quality evidence visible at the source.

Start a conversation

Return to Horizen overview